Re: Upgrade issue (again).

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgrade issue (again).
Date: 2001-05-16 23:05:27
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.33.0105162000010.68237-100000@mobile.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 16 May 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I am loathe to even bring this up, but with two messages today about it, I am
> going to be short and sweet:
>
> We don't have a reasonable upgrade path. ASCII dump->install
> new->initdb->restore is not a reasonable upgrade. It is confusing to the
> newbie, and should be fixed. We used to have an upgrade path in pg_upgrade
> - -- but it no longer works (but it was most definitely a fine effort for its
> time, Bruce!). Furthermore, the dump/restore cycle is a pain in the neck when
> tables get larger than a few hundred megabytes. It's worse when the newer
> version won't properly restore from the old dump -- and you have to edit,
> potentially by hand, a multi-gigabyte dump to get it to restore.

Personally ... I just upgraded 13 gig worth of databases using
dump/restore, didn't have to end a single file, in less then 1.5hrs from
start to finish ... *shrug*

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-16 23:06:48 Re: Re: Queries across multiple databases (was: SELECT from a table in another database).
Previous Message Franck Martin 2001-05-16 22:48:13 RE: Configurable path to look up dynamic libraries