Re: are there plans for a threaded alternative to multiple daemons?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Clayton Vernon <cvernon(at)enron(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: are there plans for a threaded alternative to multiple daemons?
Date: 2001-04-28 19:47:00
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.33.0104281646210.411-100000@mobile.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Clayton Vernon wrote:

> I was wondering what the plans were for PostgreSQL to convert to the
> one process multithreaded approach, as Apache, Interbase and others
> are doing?

there has been talk about doing some threads actions inside of a
process, but, if I recall my read of Apache2, they are still doing
multi-process, with threading inside of each process ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashley Clark 2001-04-28 20:14:21 Re: SQL Where Like - Range it?!
Previous Message Erich K. Oliphant 2001-04-28 19:40:45 VACUUMing in general