Re: Re: Call for platforms

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date: 2001-03-22 15:31:07
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.33.0103221130230.41105-100000@mobile.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > Solaris x86/7 results, for example, in geometry.out, show a difference of:
> > 3,-3.06204718156754e-11 (expected)
> > 3,-3.06204718035418e-11 (results)
> > acceptable diviation?
>
> That sort of deviation is well within bounds, particularly for geometry
> tests which might have some transcendental math involved.
>
> Is Solaris-x86 ready to go then?

Nope, still working through some things ... the select_implicit test
failed completely:

dragon:/home/centre/marc/src/postgresql-7.1RC1/src/test/regress> more results/select_implicit.out
psql: connectDBStart() -- connect() failed: Connection refused
Is the postmaster running locally
and accepting connections on Unix socket '/tmp/.s.PGSQL.65432'?

I'm going to re-run the test(s) and see if its an isolated thing or not ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl DeBisschop 2001-03-22 15:49:00 Re: OID as Primary Key
Previous Message Anand Raman 2001-03-22 15:30:47 Re: transaction aborted with error

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-03-22 15:33:33 solaris 7/sparc good to go:
Previous Message Larry Rosenman 2001-03-22 15:23:04 Re: Re: Call for platforms