Re: Some thoughts on replication

Have you looked at the replication code that is in contrib?

On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> Maybe this belongs to the developers mailing list, but I'm not subscribed to
> that list, so I post it here.
>
> I've read through todo list on the website, especially the planned
> replication feature. It seems to me that implementing replication into
> postgresql is a rather hard and longterm task.
>
> I want to show two possible alternatives, used in a real world application (a
> billing system based on Informix) I was involved in a few years ago.
>
> In our case we didn't need (or want) to replicate the whole database, but
> only a few tables. The first thing was to use synonym tables. In Infomix one
> can just type something like
>
> create synonym mysynonym for table mytable:somedb(at)somehost;
>
> where the somedb and somehost values are optional. It was then possible to
> work on the synonym as if it where a normal table.
>
> Later, we also did table replication based on triggers, a daemon and a
> configuration table. The tables which had to be replicated where entered in
> the config table, together with their destination. Then a little script was
> used to setup the apprpriate insert, update and delete triggers for those
> tables. When one of the triggers fired, the daemon contacted its friend on
> the other host and did the same action on the remote database. I think there
> was also a timestamp in the config table which had to be updated. I don't
> know more details anymore, but that was roughly the concept.
>
> Maybe one of those two (or both) is easier and faster to realise than
> database replication.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Bye...
>
> Dirk
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org