Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (one more time) Patches with vacuum fixes available .
Date: 2001-01-24 15:52:38
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.31.0101241149490.575-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Did we decide against LAZY?
>
> I thought the core consensus was that it was too risky to install
> post-beta. On the other hand, we're installing some other pretty
> major fixes. Do we want to re-open that discussion?

I would like to see it in myself ... it will be useless post v7.1, with
all the work planned for v7.2 ... if there is some way we could get it in
before beta4 goes out, I'd feel even better about it ... Vadim? :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-01-24 15:53:05 Re: [PATCHES] Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2001-01-24 15:48:32 RE: FW: Postgresql on win32