From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL <petere(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |
Date: | 2001-01-14 03:56:51 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.31.0101132355090.500-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> Eh? Table, row, column *are* the SQL terminology. The others are
> >> leftovers from PostQuel, and it's been a long time since we've used
> >> them consistently anyway.
>
> > Okay, then its definitely me confused here ... "The Practical SQL
> > Handbook", which I don' thave in front of me ... it doesn't refer to
> > things as table/row/column ... does it?
>
> I dunno about that book, but I do have the SQL spec in front of me,
> and class/instance/attribute are not used in it. Table/row/column
> are.
Can't ask more definitive then that ... thanks for clarifying and
confiming ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-14 05:08:17 | pgsql/src backend/access/nbtree/nbtinsert.c ba ... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-14 03:55:42 | Re: pgsql/doc/src/sgml admin.sgml advanced.sgml ar ... |