Re: syslog by default?

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: syslog by default?
Date: 2001-09-11 10:18:43
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.30.0109110617500.32796-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > There was a discussion about --enable-syslog by default. What was the
> > consensus? I think this is a good one.
>
> Yes, I thought we decided it should be the default too.

I know it can have an adverse effect on a mail server, is syslog going
to give us any performance hits?

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryouichi Matsuda 2001-09-11 11:41:24 Patch for doc/jdbc.sgml
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-09-11 08:25:25 Re: enable-unicode-conversion option?