Re: Re: Link to bug webpage

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Link to bug webpage
Date: 2001-08-28 10:00:58
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.30.0108280600270.60290-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> > The fundamental problem with bug tracking has been that the available
> > tools do not fit with our obviously successful mailing-list centered
> > development process. I certainly would consider it a distraction to
> > consult that tool to be able to participate in development.
>
> As usual, Thomas cuts to the heart of the matter ...
>
> The above is an accurate statement of the problem from a developer point
> of view. ISTM that what we're missing is a window into the process for
> people who are not following the mailing lists. While we have archives,
> searching the archives is not a great answer for a number of reasons
> (most notably that there's no mechanism to ensure that closure of a bug
> is recorded in the same thread(s) that report it).
>
> The trick for a bug database will be to provide a more coherent view
> without being a drag on our proven development process.

We're already working on it, lets not get this thread started again.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reinoud van Leeuwen 2001-08-28 11:33:00 performance question
Previous Message Karel Zak 2001-08-28 09:55:28 Re: Bytea/Base64 encoders for libpq - interested?