From: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: grant and SQL92 |
Date: | 2001-06-07 14:50:54 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.30.0106071049150.64208-100000@paprika.michvhf.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Vince Vielhaber writes:
>
> > I can grant a series of privileges (comma separated) on a series of
> > objects (comma separated) to either a user, group or public NOT a
> > comma separated list of users or groups. Yet at the bottom of the
> > man page for grant
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/idocs/index.php?sql-grant.html
> >
> > it says it's allowed in SQL92. How is it this isn't allowed in
> > postgresql, is it a real pain to implement or was it just never
> > needed?
>
> There is insufficient internal representation of the GRANT parse tree,
> which makes this cumbersome to implement. Not terribly hard to fix, but
> someone needs to do it. (Where were those PostgreSQL hacker newbies?)
I figure it'll be easier to fix than to try and redo the scripts. Have
a direction you can point me in?
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | ANDREW PERRIN | 2001-06-07 14:59:06 | Re: behavior of ' = NULL' vs. MySQL vs. Standards |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2001-06-07 14:47:57 | Re: Any time estimates for 7.1.2 RPM's ? |