Re: is it really BugTool?

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Reuven Frank <reuvenb(at)milcse(dot)cig(dot)mot(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: is it really BugTool?
Date: 2001-03-06 16:03:02
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.30.0103061100020.32388-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Reuven Frank wrote:

> Dear Moderator
>
> Hi!
>
> I am currently documenting some software review processes, and the use
> of a bugtool (bug-tool, bug tool, WHATEVER!), has come up.
>
> I notice that you use "BugTool." Is that a registered term?
> May I use it?
>
> Believe it or not, the ONLY place in over 1 billion pages that the term
> appears is in your site.

It's not registered, feel free to use it. I was trying to decide which
sounded better, bug tool or bug form or something like that. When I
chose bugtool I just tried a few different spellings and capital methods
with it till I decided on BugTool.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2001-03-06 16:19:26 Re: pg 7.1 b5 appears to require a "modern version of tcl"
Previous Message Justin Clift 2001-03-06 07:13:07 Irony bug