| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Date: | 2000-10-16 13:08:50 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0010161008280.321-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I like the pg_{import,export} names myself ... *nod*
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> > > > As a result do people have any objection to changing pg_restore to
> > > > pg_undump? Or pg_load?
>
> Also possible would be a name like Oracle
> pg_exp and pg_imp for export and import.
> (or pg_export and pg_import)
>
> Load and unload is often more tied to data only (no dml).
>
> I agree that the current name pg_restore for its current functionality
> is not good and misleading in the light of WAL backup.
>
> Andreas
>
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-16 14:30:50 | Re: bytea type |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-10-16 12:45:14 | AW: analyze.c |