Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Date: 2000-10-14 02:31:46
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0010132330510.654-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Philip Warner wrote:

> The fear is that this may distort other priorities - hence why
> increased transparency in decision making is important. If Bruce, Tom
> & Jan make a design decision, then chances are it's going to be pretty
> good. The problem is it will/may be seen as a GB decision.

I don't know ... the recent discussion in -hackers on the whole ALTER
TABLE DROP COLUMN tends to show that even those "in the pay of" don't
necessarily agree :)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-14 02:34:58 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-14 02:22:09 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-10-14 02:34:58 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-14 02:22:09 Re: Re: [HACKERS] My new job