From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Status of new relation file naming |
Date: | 2000-09-12 21:42:14 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0009121841190.1305-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > depending on what it takes to implement, if we implement it now, that
> > > > leaves ~1.5mos for someone to come up with a solution before release ...
> > >
> > > Well, we are 18 days from beta. Do we think we can handle that at this
> > > time?
> >
> > My feeling was that the implementation was pretty much decided upon, it
> > was just a matter of saying "go ahead, do it" ... so, "go ahead, do
> > it" ... we have 18 days before beta, and then another 30 or so until
> > release, which should have us releasing, what, around Jan 1, 2001? :)
>
> Yes, Jan 1 would be my guess. My only question is whether we are making
> things harder for administrators and whether putting some smarts in WAL
> to keep readable file names would be easier.
guess we'll find out ... considering what I've seen of Oracle and its
layouts, I doubt we're making anything harder then most are used to :)
now, guess the next question is ... who is the one implementing this and
how soon can we get it in place?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-09-12 23:26:17 | RE: strange behaviour (bug) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-09-12 21:39:38 | Re: strange behaviour (bug) |