Re: Status of new relation file naming

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Status of new relation file naming
Date: 2000-09-12 21:42:14
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0009121841190.1305-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > > > depending on what it takes to implement, if we implement it now, that
> > > > leaves ~1.5mos for someone to come up with a solution before release ...
> > >
> > > Well, we are 18 days from beta. Do we think we can handle that at this
> > > time?
> >
> > My feeling was that the implementation was pretty much decided upon, it
> > was just a matter of saying "go ahead, do it" ... so, "go ahead, do
> > it" ... we have 18 days before beta, and then another 30 or so until
> > release, which should have us releasing, what, around Jan 1, 2001? :)
>
> Yes, Jan 1 would be my guess. My only question is whether we are making
> things harder for administrators and whether putting some smarts in WAL
> to keep readable file names would be easier.

guess we'll find out ... considering what I've seen of Oracle and its
layouts, I doubt we're making anything harder then most are used to :)

now, guess the next question is ... who is the one implementing this and
how soon can we get it in place?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-09-12 23:26:17 RE: strange behaviour (bug)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-09-12 21:39:38 Re: strange behaviour (bug)