Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tim Perdue <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Date: 2000-07-05 03:30:19
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0007050030030.33627-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> If your web site is truly read only, yes, you don't need transactions. But
> then you don't need a database either. If your web site does writes, you
> need transactions, or you're really not trying hard enough.

... or not popular enough :)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-07-05 03:40:18 Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-07-05 03:28:36 Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres