Re: app-index in www.pgsql.com

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: app-index in www.pgsql.com
Date: 2000-06-23 16:10:37
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0006231310300.82677-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Fixed too, thanks ...

On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com wrote:

> thanks!!! I got the key words and got the site(s).
>
> P.S. there is a moreinfo link to "full.cgi", not working,
> but does not matter to me :-)
>
> thanks again
>
> Kai
>
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> >
> > fixed, we hadn't known it was down ... we had moved over our database from
> > a v6.5.3 -> v7.0 , and onto a seperate machine then before, and missed
> > that script ...
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 kaiq(at)realtyideas(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > > anybody have a copy of the app-index in pgsql.com site?
> > >
> > > I remember I saw something important thare, but forget what
> > > is it. And I really feel I need it now. Can somebody help?
> > >
> > > is there any business reason not to activate the app-index?
> > > if not, please make it alive? Please, it is really very very
> > > helpful -- good for both newbie, evaluators and experienced.
> > >
> > > if can not restore it, at least somebody give me a copy of
> > > the old page? somebody saved it? I should have saved it!
> > >
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Kai
> > >
> >
> > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
> > Systems Administrator @ hub.org
> > primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
> >
>
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Snow 2000-06-23 16:17:05 RE: Need to improve performance
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-06-23 16:07:05 Re: boolean isn't boolean?