From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings |
Date: | 2000-02-25 21:14:25 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0002251713440.81087-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Jan Wieck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there was discussion about readding the lztext type for
> internal use in pg_rewrite for 7.0, then remove it again once
> we have TOAST.
>
> Was because significant growth of the rule plan strings due
> to other changes can cause views/rules to be rejected by 7.0,
> that easily worked with 6.5.
>
> I've reconstructed the entire lztext type now from CVS, could
> reapply changes and reactivate deleted files from ./Attic.
> Will work on a NOTICE/ERROR message now, preventing users to
> use it in their schemas.
>
> But it requires an initdb and we're in BETA. So I better ask
> if someone complains.
this close to the beginning of beta, I would say go for it ... the
benefits of doing so, as I undesrtand it, *far* outweighs the disadvantage
of requiring an initdb ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-02-25 21:29:40 | Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings |
Previous Message | kaiq | 2000-02-25 20:49:19 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS |