| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Rod Chamberlin <rod(at)querix(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL |
| Date: | 2000-01-06 16:46:10 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0001061245260.18498-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We support enough datestyle variants already that it's hard to believe
> >> there isn't one that will meet your needs. But if not, I think adding
> >> an "Informix" datestyle option might be considered reasonable.
>
> > Isn't Thomas trying to reduce the number of variants?
>
> He wants to eliminate the essentially-duplicate datatypes, but I didn't
> think he was proposing eliminating any datestyle functionality...
> there would be squawks if he did, methinks...
'K, just wanted to clarify that point...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rod Chamberlin | 2000-01-06 16:46:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-06 16:43:46 | Re: [HACKERS] btree: failed to add item to |