| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | monty(at)tcx(dot)se |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martin Ramsch <m(dot)ramsch(at)computer(dot)org>, MySQL mailing list <mysql(at)lists(dot)mysql(dot)com>, postgresql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, randyboy <randyboy(at)whispers(dot)blackmist(dot)org>, Paul DuBois <paul(at)snake(dot)net>, Patrick Greenwell <patrick(at)stealthgeeks(dot)net>, Scott Perkins <2scott(at)bellsouth(dot)net>, mcgarry(at)tig(dot)com(dot)au |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
| Date: | 1999-10-07 02:47:15 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.10.9910062340250.17532-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Michael Widenius wrote:
> As you may have seen on the postgreSQL list, crash-me was actually
> right that postgreSQL didn't support -- comments and HAVING as
> required by ANSI SQL. Isn't it nice that we help you fix your bugs?
Actually, I believe Thomas did research on this point (or was it Tom?) and
determined that HAVING w/o aggregates is *not* required by ANSI SQL ...
could out point out where this requirement is listed? *raised eyebrow*
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-07 03:17:19 | Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
| Previous Message | Tom Dryden | 1999-10-07 02:01:12 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |