From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] v6.5.2 vacuum...? |
Date: | 1999-09-18 23:30:23 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.10.9909182029040.27097-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Okay, was able to do a subsequent vacuum and vacuum analyze...but, the
psql was running onthe same machine as the server, so I'm curious as to
why it would have disconnected...?
Also, side note...\h vacuum shows that 'vacuum [verbose] analyze' should
work, but if you try and run it,it gives an error...error in psql's help,
or the backend?
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > Just tried to do a vacuum analyze on a new database, and the backend
> > started spewing out:
>
> > FATAL: pq_endmessage failed: errno=32
> > pq_flush: send() failed: Broken pipe
> > FATAL: pq_endmessage failed: errno=32
> > pq_flush: send() failed: Broken pipe
> > FATAL: pq_endmessage failed: errno=32
> > pq_flush: send() failed: Broken pipe
> > FATAL: pq_endmessage failed: errno=32
>
> I'm not seeing it here with a REL6_5 build from Thursday. It looks
> suspiciously like a problem I thought I'd fixed a good while back,
> wherein the backend didn't behave too gracefully if the client
> disconnected early.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-09-18 23:31:27 | Re: [HACKERS] case bug? |
Previous Message | Michael Alan Dorman | 1999-09-18 22:38:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2 |