RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size

On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Ansley, Michael wrote:

> The reason for the tag as to be able to return to the 6.5 release source
> code. It's production code, and should be accessible at least for the next
> couple of months.
>
> Was a tag created for 6.5.1? The object is to be able to check out any
> particular release, bugs and all, whenever we feel like it.

Never did v6.5.1...but I have no problem with starting to do this on minor
releases to, since...

Could someone try out the following patch?

ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/postgresql-6.5-6.5.x.patch.gz

It is a patch against v6.5 that will bring it up to the most stable
version *if* it worked right. Reading through the patch, everything looks
good, but...

If this actually works, we just might have a way of saving ppl downloading
5Meg files on minor releases, as the above is <100k :)

>
> MikeA
>
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> >> > Just for a confirmation: I see REL6_5_PATCHES and REL6_5 Tag in the
> >> > CVS respository. I thought that REL6_5_PATCHES is the Tag
> >> for the 6.5
> >> > statble tree and would eventually become 6.5.2. If so, what is the
> >> > REL6_5 Tag? Or I totally miss the point?
> >>
> >> Right, REL6_5_PATCHES is the 6.5.* branch. REL6_5 is just a tag ---
> >> that is, it's effectively a frozen snapshot of the 6.5 release,
> >> not an evolvable branch.
> >>
> >> I am not sure if Marc intends to continue this naming convention
> >> in future, or if it was just a mistake to create REL6_5 as a tag
> >> not a branch. I don't see a whole lot of use for the frozen tag
> >> myself...
> >>
> >> regards, tom lane
> >>
> >> ************
> >>
>
> ************
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org