| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] cvs log for libpq-int.h ... |
| Date: | 1999-07-30 11:48:56 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9907300846410.78452-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Just curious, but why...?
> >
> > revision 1.10
> > date: 1999/07/13 20:00:37; author: momjian; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2
> > Redefine cpu's as __cpu__. Only for 6.6 branch.
> >
> >
> > Why 'Only for 6.6...'?
>
> 6.5.* is a dead branch.
>From a development standpoint, yes...from a commercial standpoint,
no...6.5.x represents our only stable branch until v6.6 takes over its
place...
I'm planning on maintaining it such that if a client calls up, running
v6.5.x and saying there is a bug, we can easily supply a patch to him to
fix it...telling a commercial/production site that "its fixed in v6.6,
which will be out in 4 months", IMHO, is no longer acceptable...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 1999-07-30 12:02:45 | Re: [HACKERS] web-based front end development |
| Previous Message | Michael Robinson | 1999-07-30 05:57:57 | Re: [HACKERS] web-based front end development |