Re: [HACKERS] psql & query string length

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql & query string length
Date: 1999-07-20 14:59:01
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9907201058010.11576-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> I sort of thought that the basic idea is that backslash commands are
> parsed and executed without any effect on the state of an incompletely
> entered query, except when the specific backslash command is defined to
> do something with the query buffer. I might be all wet though.

That's the way it works here Tom, so you shouldn't be needing a towel :)

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-07-20 15:12:06 Re: [HACKERS] Contributing
Previous Message Uncle George 1999-07-20 14:58:39 Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha