RE: [HACKERS] Current TODO list

On Wed, 19 May 1999, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
> > [mailto:owner-pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 11:41 PM
> > To: Peter T Mount
> > Cc: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Current TODO list
> >
> >
> > Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> > > This was done (twice if I remember). The tables now split at 1G. This
> > > opened a new problem that vacuum can't handle segmented tables.
> > I have the
> > > general idea of how to fix this, but again it's time that's the problem.
> >
> > Ole Gjerde <gjerde(at)icebox(dot)org> just contributed a patch for the vacuum
> > problem. Perhaps you at least have time to check his patch?
> >
>
> I wonder that no one but me object to the patch.
> It may cause serious results.

How? Why? In what way? Details?

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org