Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Michael Lausch <mla(at)gams(dot)co(dot)at>
Cc: Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Date: 1999-04-27 02:42:42
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9904262340410.578-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I use KDE at home, as well as at work...KDE uses MICO...

The CORBA implemetaion, as discussed before, is going to have to be
'wrappered' so that it isn't tied to any particular implementation...

Taral was, I believe, planning on starting with MICO and then let's those
using other implementations build up from there...

On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Michael Lausch wrote:

> >>>>> "t" == Taral <taral(at)taral(dot)net>
> >>>>> wrote the following on Mon, 26 Apr 1999 13:20:55 -0500 (CDT)
>
> t> On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Todd Graham Lewis wrote:
> >> Given that PostgreSQL is a C project, why not use a C ORB like ORBit?
> >> It's a whole lot faster than MICO...
>
> t> Does it fully support 2.2?
>
> yes. And i've written a multi database package for the Gnome Project
> using ORbit. Take a look at <http://www.lausch.at/gda> to find the
> documentation. You'll get the source from the gnome ftp server. It's
> called gnome-db and postgres is already a supported database.,
>
> t> Taral
> --
> Michael Lausch
> See my web page <http://www.lausch.at/> or query PGP key server for PGP key.
> "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away".
> -- Philip K. Dick
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Taral 1999-04-27 02:50:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling)
Previous Message Leslie Mikesell 1999-04-27 01:53:23 Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ?