Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Clark Evans <clark(dot)evans(at)manhattanproject(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...?
Date: 1999-03-30 19:08:33
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9903301508120.55565-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Ya, that's what I forgot too :( Its not something I use everyday, so
never think about it :)

On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Clark Evans wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > To find duplicate records, or, at least,
> > data in a particular field, he suggests
> > just doing:
> >
> > SELECT id,count(1)
> > FROM clients
> > GROUP BY id
> > HAVING count(1) > 1;
> >
> > A nice, clean, simple solution :)
>
> Ya. That's pretty. For some
> reason I always forget using the
> 'HAVING' clause, and end up using
> a double where clause.
>
> :) Clark
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Davis 1999-03-30 21:23:59 Interesting failure when selecting aggregates
Previous Message Clark Evans 1999-03-30 18:47:58 Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...?