Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3? and version numbers

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Terry Mackintosh <terry(at)terrym(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3? and version numbers
Date: 1999-02-17 19:58:14
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9902171556480.39507-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Terry Mackintosh wrote:

> Hi all
>
> First, what ever came of the talk of a 6.4.3 and supporting a release
> back?
>
> A client of mine has 6.3 installed, and I need to know if I should advise
> them to go to 6.4.2? or if 6.4.3 is about to come out? or how close is
> 6.5? (I want to use some of the features not in 6.3.x)
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> On another matter, version numbers. What would every one think of numbers
> where to 2nd number being odd or even denotes development or stable
> respectively? like with the Linux kernel.

Not in your wildest dreams...that has been asked over and over again ove
the past few years, and I veto it each and every time...we follow the *BSD
development model, not the Linux one...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter T Mount 1999-02-17 21:59:06 Continued problems with pgdump, Large Objects and crashing backends
Previous Message Terry Mackintosh 1999-02-17 18:46:42 6.4.3? and version numbers