| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>, jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] redolog - for discussion |
| Date: | 1998-12-13 21:04:03 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9812131703220.479-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 12 Dec 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > It's time to re-implement sequences! When they were implemented
> > ~ 1.5 year ago there was no GRANT/REVOKE on VIEWs and so
> > I had to create table for each sequence.
> > There should be one system table - pg_sequence. One record
> > for each sequence will be inserted into this table and
> > one VIEW will be created:
>
> I thought you wanted a single table to prevent concurrent access/update
> contension?
let's revise what vadim stated *grin*
"we should re-implement sequences for v6.5, since row-level
locking will exist at that time"? *rofl*
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-12-13 21:06:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1998-12-13 20:15:34 | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |