Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Robinson <robinson(at)public(dot)bta(dot)net(dot)cn>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Date: 1998-11-14 14:24:50
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9811141019460.337-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 14 Nov 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > >Current FE/BE protocol seems pretty optimized to me, but you should know
> > >the best. Seems like a waste to try and get it to match some standard,
> >
> > Well, I suppose you could make the same argument about SQL-92 compliance.
> >
> > Standards compliance is useful because it plugs you into the positive-
> > feedback cycle of product development. Your product works with more
> > products, more people use your product, more products are developed which
> > work with your product, etc.
>
> Not really the same. There are end-user visible changes, and
> developer-visible changes.

From how things sound, I think that implementing Corba will be the
trigger for 7.0...:)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-11-14 15:38:08 Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-11-14 14:19:17 Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA