Re: [GENERAL] 8k limit

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Dan Delaney <dionysos(at)dionysia(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL General List <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8k limit
Date: 1998-10-28 02:15:24
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9810272214180.25965-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


There are plans for doing what Bruce refers to as...what was his term?
Its basically 'row wrapping'...the row limit is still 8k, but the server
is smart enough to link two rows together to give you larger then that.

It won't be in v6.4...but should be (or something similar) in a future
release...

On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Dan Delaney wrote:

> Is there any chance of the 8k tuple limit going away in
> future releases of PostgreSQL? I was working on setting up a
> listserv archive with fields such as sentfrom, date,
> subject, and body, but the content of the body field would
> often exceed 8k because some people are just long-winded.
> I'd really rather not have to deal with the LO interface.
> Thanks.
> --Dan
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Daniel G. Delaney The Louisville Times Chorus
> Dionysos(at)Dionysia(dot)org www.LouisvilleTimes.org
> www.Dionysia.org/~dionysos/ Dionysia Design
> ICQ Number: 8171285 www.Dionysia.com/design/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Only two things are infinite: the universe and stupidity--
> and I'm not sure about the former."
> --Albert Einstein
>

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

  • 8k limit at 1998-10-27 19:21:13 from Dan Delaney

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Callahan 1998-10-28 02:32:06 Default Function/Operator for "order by"?
Previous Message Mike Meyer 1998-10-28 01:28:25 Re: [GENERAL] 8k limit