Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>
Cc: Steve Doliov <statsol(at)statsol(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres vs commercial products
Date: 1998-07-24 01:23:25
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980723222005.261E-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Herouth Maoz wrote:

> Not that I want to offend the Postgres developers, who are doing a great
> job. But in the same way that commercial enterprises think in terms of
> profit, volunteer workers think of it like this: Does it interest me to
> implement this feature? Do I have the time? Do I have the expertise?

I don't believe any offence could be taken by this...my question
back is are those features that are currently missing of such an import to
you that you'd be willing to pay one of the developers to take the time to
focus on what you require?

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-07-24 01:53:17 Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux]
Previous Message Dan Delaney 1998-07-24 00:50:57 Re: [GENERAL] How about this LOGO?