Re: [HACKERS] cidr

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: vixie(at)vix(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cidr
Date: 1998-07-21 04:06:47
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980721010626.13063K-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On Mon, 20 Jul 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > We can call it cidr. That is fine. I was just concerned that if we put
> > > it in contrib, that people who have never heard of cidr, like me, can
> > > recognize the usefulness of the type for their applications.
> >
> > IMHO, those that will use it, will know what it is...AFAIK, CIDR
> > is a pretty generic/standard term, one that I've known for at least 6
> > years now, so it isn't really "new-style".
> >
> > > Yes, I agree, this is a HOT type, and should be installed in the default
> > > system. Contrib is for testing/narrow audience, and this type certainly
> > > should be mainstream. This is the third generation of the type, with a
> > > wide audience. int8 is also coming into the main tree via Thomas.
> >
> > Contrib for v6.4, mainstream by v6.5?
>
> ip_and_mac was contrib for 6.3. Why not mainstream for 6.4?

That works even better...:)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-07-21 04:17:49 Re: Large Objects buffer leak patch(es)
Previous Message Matthew N. Dodd 1998-07-21 03:58:32 Re: [HACKERS] cidr