Re: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected (revisited)

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: David Schanen <mtv(at)ibm(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, prod_dev(at)natrindo(dot)co(dot)id, miker(at)scifair(dot)acadiau(dot)ca
Subject: Re: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected (revisited)
Date: 1998-06-23 18:59:14
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980623145457.16934j-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, David Schanen wrote:

>
>
> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 22 Jun 1998, David Schanen wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marc & Mike,
> > >
> > > Looking at the backtrace from the debug.core It seems to me like we are
> > > still getting the BTP_CHAIN errors we saw in previous versions.
> >
> > You are using v6.3.2+patches currently?
>
> Actually, we are using the basic 6.3.2, no patches applied yet. I'll look into that.
> Is this a known bug fix in the current patch release?

I haven't seen it since upgrading my server(s) to v6.3.2+patches,
where I saw it relatively often before hand...but I won't guarantee that
that just hasn't been luck either...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-06-23 19:02:42 Re: [HACKERS] I thought we had fixed this for v6.3.2 ...?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-06-23 18:42:26 Re: [HACKERS] Problem after removal of exec(), help