| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Date: | 1998-05-23 19:41:46 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.980523164128.26778F-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 23 May 1998, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, the upshot from here is that having done "cvs checkout pgsql"
> once, I can do either
> cvs update -- within pgsql
> cvs -d blahblah checkout pgsql -- in parent directory
> and they both seem to work and do the same thing (although with no
> updates committed in the last two hours, it's hard to be sure).
>
> If I omit the -d option to the cvs checkout, it fails; it does not
> know enough to fetch the repository address from pgsql/CVS/Root.
> But cvs update is cool.
>
> Dunno why it doesn't work for Marc. I'm running cvs 1.9; you?
Yup, but I have a few suspicious on why it doesn't work that I'll
investigate on monday :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1998-05-23 20:51:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-05-23 19:41:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Current sources? |