| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6 |
| Date: | 1998-03-17 07:40:44 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.980317033838.402C-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 16 Mar 1998, David Gould wrote:
> Just to fill me in, where does the mega patch fall in with the next release
> snapshot? That is, if this misses the mega patch is it waiting until 6.4?
That is pretty much up to you, actually. There is nothing wrong
with a clean patch for this being placed in the patches directory, if it
can be done shortly after the post-release patch. Basically, starting
April 1st (or so), development basically starts up again, so backtracking
a patch from v6.4-alpha to v6.3 release can prove difficult :(
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 1998-03-17 08:16:59 | Re: Multi field hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-03-17 07:30:47 | Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field |