Re: [HACKERS] SunOS patches

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SunOS patches
Date: 1998-03-02 03:05:56
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980301230508.230Z-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2 Mar 1998 t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp wrote:

>
> included are patches for Feb 26 snapshot. I hope these are the last
> patches for SunOS port:-)

Ack!

> P.S. I didn't see my patches to tempalte/.similar in Mar 1
> snapshot. Should I repost the patches?
> ---
> Tatsuo Ishii
> t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** backend/libpq/pqcomm.c.orig Fri Feb 27 14:07:52 1998
> --- backend/libpq/pqcomm.c Fri Feb 27 14:08:50 1998
> ***************
> *** 564,571 ****
> * Shutdown routine for backend connection
> * If a Unix socket is used for communication, explicitly close it.
> */
> ! static void
> ! do_unlink()
> {
> if (sock_path[0])
> unlink(sock_path);
> --- 564,571 ----
> * Shutdown routine for backend connection
> * If a Unix socket is used for communication, explicitly close it.
> */
> ! void
> ! StreamDoUnlink()

What breaks by renaming this function?? :(

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message t-ishii 1998-03-02 03:21:26 Re: [HACKERS] SunOS patches
Previous Message t-ishii 1998-03-02 02:37:04 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.3 issues