| From: | "Ron Mayer" <ron(at)intervideo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hard problem with concurrency |
| Date: | 2003-02-18 18:56:23 |
| Message-ID: | POEDIPIPKGJJLDNIEMBEKEHJCDAA.ron@intervideo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
FWIW, that's the approach O*'s taking.
http://otn.oracle.com/products/oracle9i/daily/Aug24.html
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 11:02 AM
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Cc: Tom Lane; Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hard problem with concurrency
Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
> REPLACE INTO anyone? ;)
The upcoming SQL 200x standard includes a MERGE command that appears to
fulfill that purpose.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-02-18 19:02:29 | Re: Hard problem with concurrency |
| Previous Message | afterz | 2003-02-18 17:59:01 | New Feature - Project |