RE: Update comments in multixact.c

From: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Update comments in multixact.c
Date: 2023-01-18 10:02:28
Message-ID: OSZPR01MB6310A7CE00D48662CC829929FDC79@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 6:04 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 1:33 AM shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > I noticed that commit 5212d447fa updated some comments in multixact.c
> because
> > SLRU truncation for multixacts is performed during VACUUM, instead of
> > checkpoint. Should the following comments which mentioned checkpointer be
> > changed, too?
>
> Yes, I think so.

Thanks for your reply.

Attach a patch which fixed them.

Regards,
Shi yu

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Update-comments-in-multixact.c.patch application/octet-stream 1.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-01-18 10:24:19 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2023-01-18 09:59:11 Re: Helper functions for wait_for_catchup() in Cluster.pm