RE: Logical replication timeout problem

From: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Logical replication timeout problem
Date: 2022-03-31 02:26:06
Message-ID: OSZPR01MB631004BC8B2D69AEDBD6DDEBFDE19@OSZPR01MB6310.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 3:54 PM wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Rebase the patch because the commit d5a9d86d in current HEAD.
>

Thanks for your patch, I tried this patch and confirmed that there is no timeout
problem after applying this patch, and I could reproduce this problem on HEAD.

Regards,
Shi yu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-03-31 02:34:52 Re: Add LZ4 compression in pg_dump
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-03-31 02:17:17 Re: pgsql: Add 'basebackup_to_shell' contrib module.