RE: Question for coverage report

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Steven Niu' <niushiji(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Question for coverage report
Date: 2025-10-17 10:55:44
Message-ID: OSCPR01MB14966F1F0FD037872D411ECF0F5F6A@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Steven,

> I noticed another weird thing in your attached log. The line 1506 and 1509 should be executed
> the same number of times. But line 1506 was executed one more time than line 1509.
> Maybe a bug of gcov?

Oh, I didn't notice. Yeah it was also strange. Is there a possibility that complier optimization
did prefetch and it was also counted?

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shubham Khanna 2025-10-17 11:20:19 Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber.
Previous Message Oleg Tselebrovskiy 2025-10-17 10:53:43 Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations