RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Masahiko Sawada' <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'pgsql-hackers' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 'shveta malik' <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'vignesh C' <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Nisha Moond' <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Dilip Kumar' <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Date: 2025-07-10 12:39:21
Message-ID: OSCPR01MB14966737E180E3AE2F310FC6FF548A@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear hackers,

> -- Also, worker and logical replication related parameters were increased
> as needed (see attached scripts for details).

Sorry, I forgot to attach scripts.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Attachment Content-Type Size
row_filter_measure.sh application/octet-stream 918 bytes
row_filter_setup.sh application/octet-stream 2.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-07-10 13:14:14 Re: [Internet] Re: 回复:Re: [PATCH] Pr event replacement of a function if it's used in an index expression and is not IMMUTABLE
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-07-10 12:37:53 RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication