RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

From: "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'vignesh C' <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Date: 2021-06-15 11:10:07
Message-ID: OSBPR01MB4888412958C14C14A123E232ED309@OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tuesday, June 15, 2021 1:51 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Attached the patch-set that addressed those two comments.
> > I also fixed the commit message a bit in the 2PC specific patch to HEAD.
> > No other changes.
> >
> > Please check.
>
> Thanks for the updated patches, the patch applies cleanly in all branches.
> Please add a commitfest entry for this, so that we don't miss it.
Thank you. I've registered the patch-set in [1].
I'll wait for other reviews from other developers, if any.

[1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/3170/

Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-06-15 11:18:37 Re: Decoding speculative insert with toast leaks memory
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-06-15 11:05:42 Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety