RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

From: "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Date: 2021-06-06 22:48:13
Message-ID: OSBPR01MB488826DACCFEDB8BD00D7C0CED399@OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday, June 3, 2021 7:07 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 9:18 AM osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thank you for providing the patch.
> > I have updated your patch to include some other viewpoints.
> >
>
> I suggest creating a synchronous replication part of the patch for
> back-branches as well.
You are right. Please have a look at the attached patch-set.
Needless to say, the patch for HEAD has descriptions that depend on
the 2pc patch-set.

Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi

Attachment Content-Type Size
HEAD_deadlock_documentation_of_logical_decoding_v03.patch application/octet-stream 5.0 KB
PG13_deadlock_documentation_of_logical_decoding_v03.patch application/octet-stream 3.6 KB
PG12_deadlock_documentation_of_logical_decoding_v03.patch application/octet-stream 3.6 KB
PG11_deadlock_documentation_of_logical_decoding_v03.patch application/octet-stream 3.6 KB
PG10_deadlock_documentation_of_logical_decoding_v03.patch application/octet-stream 3.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com 2021-06-06 22:55:45 RE: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-06-06 22:23:05 Re: when the startup process doesn't