RE: ResourceOwner refactoring

From: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Heikki Linnakangas' <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com" <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: RE: ResourceOwner refactoring
Date: 2021-01-13 01:55:15
Message-ID: OSBPR01MB31575F85F7363FDA04CCE264F5A90@OSBPR01MB3157.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Heikki,

I'm also interested in this patch, but it cannot be applied to the current HEAD...

$ git apply ~/v2-0001-Make-resowners-more-easily-extensible.patch
error: patch failed: src/common/cryptohash_openssl.c:57
error: src/common/cryptohash_openssl.c: patch does not apply
error: patch failed: src/include/utils/resowner_private.h:1
error: src/include/utils/resowner_private.h: patch does not apply

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hou, Zhijie 2021-01-13 02:06:58 RE: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-01-13 01:48:52 Re: A failure of standby to follow timeline switch