RE: [Bug fix]There is the case archive_timeout parameter is ignored after recovery works.

From: "higuchi(dot)daisuke(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <higuchi(dot)daisuke(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [Bug fix]There is the case archive_timeout parameter is ignored after recovery works.
Date: 2020-06-30 04:01:15
Message-ID: OSBPR01MB17514167F6C8A3C8F3516204EC6F0@OSBPR01MB1751.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> We don't want change checkpoint interval during recovery, that means
>> we cannot cnosider archive_timeout at the fist checkpointer after
>> recovery ends. So I think that the suggestion from Fujii-san is the
>> direction.
>+1
>If this idea has some problems, we can revisit Daisuke-san's idea.

Thanks for your comments.
Ok, I will work on the fix to wake the checkpointer up at the end of recovery.

Regards,
Daisuke, Higuchi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-06-30 04:13:01 Use of "long" in incremental sort code
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-06-30 04:00:54 Re: Backpatch b61d161c14 (Introduce vacuum errcontext ...)