RE: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.”

From: "Masashi Kamura (Fujitsu)" <kamura(dot)masashi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'lakshmi' <lakshmigcdac(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.”
Date: 2026-04-21 08:50:24
Message-ID: OS9PR01MB13174C0B02AF88314FFFFEB3E942C2@OS9PR01MB13174.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Lakshmi,

Thanks for confirming that the issue can be reproduced.

Regards,

Masashi Kamura

Fujitsu Limited

From: lakshmi <lakshmigcdac(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 4:19 PM
To: Kuroda, Hayato/黒田 隼人 <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Kamura, Masashi/嘉村 雅志 <kamura(dot)masashi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ECPG: inconsistent behavior with the document in “GET/SET DESCRIPTOR.”

Hi,

I was able to reproduce this issue.

The precompiler accepts:

EXEC SQL GET DESCRIPTOR d :desc_count1 = count, :desc_count2 = count;

but generates invalid C code with concatenated variables, which fails at compile time.

After applying the patch and rebuilding ecpg, the same statement is now rejected during preprocessing with a syntax error. So the patch works as expected.

Thanks for the fix.

Regards,
Lakshmi G

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-04-21 08:51:06 Re: [PATCH] Fix duplicate errmsg in ALTER TABLE SPLIT PARTITION
Previous Message Evgeny Voropaev 2026-04-21 08:48:06 Re: Compress prune/freeze records with Delta Frame of Reference algorithm