RE: doc: should pg_createsubscriber be grouped as a client application?

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Peter Eisentraut' <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: doc: should pg_createsubscriber be grouped as a client application?
Date: 2026-06-22 06:56:45
Message-ID: OS9PR01MB12149EF54C4800843291071D4F5EF2@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Peter,

> Note that the latter includes pg_basebackup, pg_receivewal, and
> pg_recvlogical, which feel generally similar to pg_createsubscriber.

Hmm, but similar command pg_upgrade was included in the server app page.

The page [1] defined that server commands are the command can be run on the same
server with the postgres server process. IIRC, the command was categorized as
"Server Application" because it assumed standby is running on the same machine.

But... I think the command is located on the border between the server and the client.
We should hear other opinions too.

[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/reference-server.html

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henson Choi 2026-06-22 07:07:43 Re: Row pattern recognition
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-06-22 06:54:35 Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_table_ddl() to reconstruct CREATE TABLE statements