RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'ls7777' <ls7777(at)yandex(dot)ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com" <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, "amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: RE: Patch for migration of the pg_commit_ts directory
Date: 2026-05-12 00:42:28
Message-ID: OS9PR01MB12149E5D3EB7ECC31EC27683BF5392@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Sergey,

I found that Ajin started another thread which migrates replication origins [1].

So how about purging the part from this patch? I.e., commit_ts migrations would
be migrated well if both patches are pushed. To keep the behavior consistent,
[1] may have to be pushed first.

Personally considered, added checks in the patch may look bit ad-hoc, and we
should fix from the root cause.

[1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6743/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Junwang Zhao 2026-05-12 00:57:09 Re: [SQL/PGQ] Early pruning for GRAPH_TABLE path generation
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2026-05-12 00:35:55 Re: Improve pg_stat_statements scalability