| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Ajin Cherian' <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: [PATCH] Preserve replication origin OIDs in pg_upgrade |
| Date: | 2026-04-29 08:40:21 |
| Message-ID: | OS9PR01MB12149E188221BED862E4BE9E0F5342@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Ajin,
> Sequence of Events During Upgrade
>
> 1. pg_dumpall dumps all non-subscription replication origins from the
> old cluster with their roidents and LSN positions.
> 2. pg_dump dumps each subscription, but now records the old roident
> alongside the subscription info.
> 3. During restore, pg_dumpall's output recreates non-subscription
> origins on the new cluster with their original roidents via
> binary_upgrade_create_replication_origin().
To confirm, why do we have to handle separately for subscription-associated
origins? I'm thinking it's not needed if the subscription's OID is preserved
during the upgrade.
I checked the old thread to preserve it [1], but it could not be accepted because
there are no strong motivations. But I feel this is the good reason to do so now.
How do you feel?
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | cca5507 | 2026-04-29 08:46:05 | Re: Why is_admin_of_role() use ROLERECURSE_MEMBERS rather than ROLERECURSE_PRIVS? |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2026-04-29 08:07:04 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs, take2 |