| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Subject: | RE: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |
| Date: | 2026-04-27 04:46:37 |
| Message-ID: | OS9PR01MB12149DE2587D3E902BA2B1778F5362@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Hackers,
>
> We still have not decided on this point. The code corresponding to
> this part [1] has an open bug as well [2]. Based on the discussion
> here, I don't see we have a consensus with the current approach and
> even if we want to go with the current approach it seems that we need
> more work which needs further analysis. Alvaro, others, what is your
> take on this?
>
FYI, the point I raised [1] [2] seemed not to be fixed yet. Not sure it's the
last point we missed.
[1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/225003.1775571560%40localhost
[2]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1KWDbBk4FgbbWdivQLrPPzR4zgvfnHK4WjWC78rbuRVbg%40mail.gmail.com
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2026-04-27 04:51:38 | Re: ri_LockPKTuple misleading message |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-04-27 04:25:30 | Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently] |