| From: | "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: subscriptionCheck failures on nightjar |
| Date: | 2026-04-13 05:01:22 |
| Message-ID: | OS9PR01MB12149D939764F0E34521A298FF5242@OS9PR01MB12149.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi hackers,
Sorry for reviving the old thread. While digging threads related with
the recent BF failure [1] I found here. And same issues were reported
like [2] and [3], everything happened on the Windows platform.
Per my quick lookup of this thread, the issue could not happen if rename()
works atomically. I'm not sure for Windows env, but does it mean We do not use
atomic renaming on them?
[1]: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2026-04-12%2003%3A43%3A28
[2]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/17989-6b9f058bad9cd31b%40postgresql.org
[3]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/18638-760882b4e5851b71%40postgresql.org
Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2026-04-13 05:18:38 | Re: Support EXCEPT for ALL SEQUENCES publications |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2026-04-13 05:00:03 | Re: DELETE/UPDATE FOR PORTION OF with rule system is not working |